FTMS vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

FTMS (Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FTMS is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

FTMS vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMS achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCMB's 1.58% return.

FTMS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 3.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMS vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF	1.41%	0.47%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.58%	0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMS and SCMB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

FTMS vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 70
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMS vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTMS	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.33	—

Drawdowns

FTMS vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMS	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-6.13%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.36%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-1.31%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMS	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73%	2.89%	-1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.73%	4.13%	-2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.73%	4.13%	-2.40%

FTMS vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FTMS vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than SCMB's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF	1.97%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.52%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMS and SCMB in my portfolio?

FTMS and SCMB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMS or SCMB?

On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMS or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for FTMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMS or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.97% for FTMS.

What is the main difference between FTMS and SCMB?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.03% for SCMB.