FTMS vs. DIVI
FTMS (Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FTMS vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMS achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 8.85% return.
FTMS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 8.85%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
FTMS vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.41% | 0.37% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 8.85% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMS and DIVI is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMS vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FTMS
DIVI
FTMS vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMS | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.65 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
FTMS vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMS | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -27.76% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.83% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -3.63% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility
FTMS vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMS | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 15.06% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 15.33% | -13.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 16.48% | -14.71% |
FTMS vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTMS vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than DIVI's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.60% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.97% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMS and DIVI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for FTMS.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.97% for FTMS.
FTMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.09% for DIVI.
Find the right allocation for FTMS and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer