PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMS vs. MMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMS vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMS achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 3.45% return.


FTMS

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMMA

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.64%
YTD
3.45%
6M
3.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMS vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMS and MMMA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMS vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTMS vs. MMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTMS vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum MMMA drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and MMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMSMMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-2.79%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.09%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.55%

+0.27%

Volatility

FTMS vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMSMMMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71%

4.04%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.71%

4.04%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.71%

4.04%

-2.33%

FTMS vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMS vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison

FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than MMMA's 1.95% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMS and MMMA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTMS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTMS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.

FTMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.95% for MMMA.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.35% for MMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMS and MMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer