FTMS vs. MYMF
FTMS (Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF) and MYMF (State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MYMF.
Performance
FTMS vs. MYMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMS achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than MYMF's 0.66% return.
FTMS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMS vs. MYMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.41% | 0.37% |
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMS and MYMF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMS vs. MYMF — Risk / Return Rank
FTMS
MYMF
FTMS vs. MYMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMS | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 1.39 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FTMS vs. MYMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum MYMF drawdown of -2.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and MYMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMS | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -2.02% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.02% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -0.18% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
FTMS vs. MYMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMS | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 0.75% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 1.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 1.65% | +0.12% |
FTMS vs. MYMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MYMF's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTMS vs. MYMF - Dividend Comparison
FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than MYMF's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.97% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.47% | 2.80% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMS and MYMF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for FTMS.
MYMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.97% for FTMS.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.20% for MYMF.
Find the right allocation for FTMS and MYMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer