FTMS vs. AUSM
FTMS (Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.
Performance
FTMS vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMS achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 1.22% return.
FTMS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUSM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMS vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.41% | 0.47% |
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 1.22% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMS and AUSM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMS vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMS vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and AUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMS | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -0.42% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.09% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FTMS vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMS | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73% | 0.74% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 0.74% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 0.74% | +0.99% |
FTMS vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTMS vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison
FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than AUSM's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 2.61% | 1.26% |
FTMS Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF | 1.97% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMS and AUSM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for FTMS.
AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.97% for FTMS.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.18% for AUSM.
Find the right allocation for FTMS and AUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer