PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSM vs. NUMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSM vs. NUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSM achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than NUMI's 1.56% return.


AUSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.16%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUMI

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.00%
YTD
1.56%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSM vs. NUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AUSM
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF
1.34%1.58%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
1.56%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSM and NUMI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSM vs. NUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSM
AUSM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMI
NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSM vs. NUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUSMNUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.26

1.47

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

2.51

+4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.53

8.33

+12.20

AUSM vs. NUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSM Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the NUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSM and NUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUSM vs. NUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSM drawdown since its inception was -0.42%, smaller than the maximum NUMI drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSM and NUMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSMNUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-4.72%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-2.82%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.33%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

0.85%

-0.71%

Volatility

AUSM vs. NUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) is 0.13%, while Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that AUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSMNUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.53%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.45%

2.20%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

3.29%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.73%

4.25%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.73%

4.25%

-3.52%

AUSM vs. NUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUSM vs. NUMI - Dividend Comparison

AUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than NUMI's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AUSM
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF
2.61%1.26%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
3.64%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSM and NUMI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMI has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to AUSM (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSM dropped -0.42% vs NUMI's -4.72%.

On 1-year performance, NUMI leads with 7.07% vs 2.89% for AUSM. On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AUSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUMI has performed better with a 7.07% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NUMI.

NUMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.61% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AUSM and 0.29% for NUMI.

AUSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSM and NUMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer