PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMN vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTMN having a 1.52% return and ZMUN slightly higher at 1.57%.


FTMN

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMN and ZMUN is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTMNZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

6.46

-5.51

Drawdowns

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMNZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-0.09%

-3.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.02%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.01%

-0.70%

Volatility

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMNZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

0.54%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

0.54%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

0.54%

+3.60%

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMN vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMN and ZMUN have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMN.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.

FTMN tracks Actively Managed, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMN and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer