FTMN vs. DIVI
FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FTMN vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMN achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 10.71% return.
FTMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
FTMN vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.81% | 0.27% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.71% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMN and DIVI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMN vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FTMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVI
FTMN vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMN | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMN vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMN | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -27.76% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.01% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -3.62% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility
FTMN vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMN | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 15.34% | -11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 15.43% | -11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 16.36% | -12.21% |
FTMN vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMN vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than DIVI's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.05% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMN and DIVI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMN.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.
FTMN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FTMN tracks Actively Managed, while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 0.09% for DIVI.
Find the right allocation for FTMN and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer