FTMH vs. RMOP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RMOP.

Performance

FTMH vs. RMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTMH having a 3.48% return and RMOP slightly lower at 3.38%.

FTMH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMOP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 10.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMH vs. RMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	3.48%	0.11%
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	3.38%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMH and RMOP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

FTMH vs. RMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMOP

RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 82
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMH vs. RMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMH	RMOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.99	+0.54

Drawdowns

FTMH vs. RMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum RMOP drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and RMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMH	RMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-6.67%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-1.52%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMH	RMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	3.81%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	5.66%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.00%	5.66%	-1.66%

FTMH vs. RMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RMOP's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMH vs. RMOP - Dividend Comparison

FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than RMOP's 5.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	2.71%	0.86%	0.00%
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	5.20%	5.15%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMH and RMOP in my portfolio?

FTMH and RMOP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMH or RMOP?

On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMH or RMOP?

FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMH or RMOP?

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.

What is the main difference between FTMH and RMOP?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.55% for RMOP.