FTMA vs. SCMB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTMA tracks the Actively Managed while SCMB tracks the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

FTMA vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.13% return.

FTMA

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 1.68%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	2.13%	0.54%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.13%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and SCMB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

FTMA vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 76
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMA vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTMA	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.26	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.54	—

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMA	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-6.13%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.81%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-1.30%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMA	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28%	2.88%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.28%	4.11%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.28%	4.11%	-0.83%

FTMA vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMA vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than SCMB's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	2.26%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.55%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMA and SCMB in my portfolio?

FTMA and SCMB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMA or SCMB?

On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMA or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMA or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.26% for FTMA.

What is the main difference between FTMA and SCMB?

FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.03% for SCMB.