FTMA vs. OILT
FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while OILT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
FTMA vs. OILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than OILT's 26.60% return.
FTMA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- YTD
- 26.60%
- 1Y
- 35.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMA vs. OILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 2.13% | 0.54% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 26.60% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMA and OILT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMA vs. OILT — Risk / Return Rank
FTMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILT
FTMA vs. OILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMA | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMA vs. OILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum OILT drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and OILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMA | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -35.21% | +32.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -14.56% | +13.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -13.04% | +12.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.68% | — |
Volatility
FTMA vs. OILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMA | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 27.71% | -24.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 28.69% | -25.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 28.69% | -25.41% |
FTMA vs. OILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTMA and OILT have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
FTMA vs. OILT - Dividend Comparison
FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than OILT's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 2.26% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.71% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMA and OILT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMA and OILT have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.26% for FTMA.
FTMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while OILT is Energy Equities. FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while OILT tracks Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Texas Capital.
Find the right allocation for FTMA and OILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer