FTMA vs. FMUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and FMUN (Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FTMA is passively managed, while FMUN is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMUN.

Performance

FTMA vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than FMUN's 1.69% return.

FTMA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMUN

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 7.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	2.06%	0.43%
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	1.69%	0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and FMUN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

FTMA vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUN

FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 67
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMA vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMA	FMUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	1.28	+0.01

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum FMUN drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and FMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMA	FMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-3.21%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.66%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-0.82%	+0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMA	FMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	3.12%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	4.06%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	4.06%	-0.54%

FTMA vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMA vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FMUN's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	3.29%	2.41%
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	1.96%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMA and FMUN in my portfolio?

FTMA and FMUN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMA or FMUN?

On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMA or FMUN?

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMA or FMUN?

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.96% for FTMA.

What is the main difference between FTMA and FMUN?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.05% for FMUN.