PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUN vs. FMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUN vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUN achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FMUB's 2.04% return.


FMUN

1D
0.11%
1M
1.40%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.55%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMUB

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.37%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUN vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUN and FMUB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.67

The correlation between FMUN and FMUB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUN vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUN vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUNFMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.54

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.70

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

10.73

-3.61

FMUN vs. FMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUN and FMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUN vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUN drawdown since its inception was -3.83%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUN and FMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUNFMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.74%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-2.49%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.16%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-0.47%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.63%

+0.36%

Volatility

FMUN vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) at 0.76%. This indicates that FMUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUNFMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.76%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

2.05%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

2.66%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.12%

3.63%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

3.63%

+0.49%

FMUN vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUN vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison

FMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FMUB's 3.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMUN and FMUB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMUN has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FMUB (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUN dropped -3.83% vs FMUB's -2.74%.

On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.03% vs 6.70% for FMUB. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 3.29% for FMUN.

Their fees differ too: 0.05% for FMUN and 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUN and FMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer