PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMA vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMA vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 0.98% return.


FTMA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and AUSM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMA vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTMA vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTMAAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

3.98

-2.68

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMAAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-0.42%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.02%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.09%

-0.42%

Volatility

FTMA vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMAAUSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

0.73%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.73%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.73%

+2.79%

FTMA vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMA vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMA and AUSM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.96% for FTMA.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.18% for AUSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMA and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer