PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 10.63% return.


FTLSX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.95%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*

PLTHX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.56%
YTD
10.63%
6M
9.95%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.00%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
10.63%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and PLTHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.69

The correlation between FTLSX and PLTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLSXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.15

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

14.01

-0.68

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-33.26%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-8.60%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.83%

-16.64%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-25.49%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.97%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-4.79%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.93%

-1.09%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) is 2.26%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that FTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

5.05%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

10.44%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

12.70%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

15.62%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

16.02%

-11.21%

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than PLTHX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.52%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.95%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLSX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTHX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to FTLSX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer