PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLS vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLS vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.25% return.


FTLS

1D
0.67%
1M
1.31%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.51%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
9.81%

KNG

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.90%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
7.07%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLS vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
5.21%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-3.01%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.25%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLS and KNG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between FTLS and KNG has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTLS vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTLS
KNG

Technology

26.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

19.9%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.1%

Industrials

7.6%
20.3%

Energy

7.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
23.5%

Communication Services

6.1%

-

Basic Materials

5.1%
10.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.4%

Utilities

0.9%
6.1%

Technology

FTLS
26.9%
KNG
4.3%

Financial Services

FTLS
19.9%
KNG
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FTLS
9.5%
KNG
5.5%

Healthcare

FTLS
8.4%
KNG
10.1%

Industrials

FTLS
7.6%
KNG
20.3%

Energy

FTLS
7.3%
KNG
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

FTLS
6.5%
KNG
23.5%

Communication Services

FTLS
6.1%
KNG

-

Basic Materials

FTLS
5.1%
KNG
10.2%

Real Estate

FTLS
1.9%
KNG
4.4%

Utilities

FTLS
0.9%
KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLS vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLS vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLSKNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

0.77

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

1.20

+1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

0.89

+3.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

2.33

+10.01

FTLS vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLS and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLSKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

0.77

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.33

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.49

+0.32

Drawdowns

FTLS vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-35.12%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-8.61%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-14.24%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-18.20%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-5.85%

+5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-4.13%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

3.29%

-2.08%

Volatility

FTLS vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is 1.93%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that FTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.68%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

7.42%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.19%

10.19%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

13.59%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

17.19%

-5.89%

FTLS vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTLS vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.90%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLS and KNG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FTLS (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLS dropped -20.54% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FTLS leads with 10.33% vs 4.40% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTLS has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.90% for FTLS.

FTLS is categorized as Long-Short, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 0.75% for KNG.

FTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLS and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer