FTLS vs. ATTR
FTLS (First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTLS charges 1.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
FTLS vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.37% return.
FTLS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTLS vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 5.21% | 0.67% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.37% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLS and ATTR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLS vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank
FTLS
ATTR
FTLS vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 2.91 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
FTLS vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.54% | -1.76% | -18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.07% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -0.18% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility
FTLS vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 2.98% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 2.98% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 2.98% | +8.32% |
FTLS vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTLS vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTLS and ATTR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.
FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for FTLS and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer