PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIHX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIHX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIHX achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.08% return.


FTIHX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.09%
YTD
13.68%
6M
15.21%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

VEA

1D
1.17%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.08%
6M
17.35%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
13.68%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.08%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and VEA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.96

The correlation between FTIHX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIHXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.85

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

10.96

-1.19

FTIHX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIHXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-60.68%

+24.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-11.63%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-13.45%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.99%

-29.71%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-35.73%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-13.27%

+6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.01%

-0.10%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) is 6.48%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that FTIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIHXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

6.92%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

14.42%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

16.58%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

16.73%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.41%

-1.30%

FTIHX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTIHX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.45%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FTIHX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to FTIHX (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIHX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer