FTIF vs. MGC
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC).
FTIF and MGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTIF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 13, 2023. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both FTIF and MGC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTIF vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTIF vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 19.63% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | -5.62% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 25.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -5.62% return.
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 32.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGC
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- -5.62%
- 6M
- -2.65%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTIF vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTIF vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank
FTIF
MGC
FTIF vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTIF | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.53 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.61 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 7.15 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTIF | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.55 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTIF and MGC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTIF vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than MGC's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 1.02% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
FTIF vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and MGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTIF | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -51.93% | +24.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.27% | -11.93% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -7.08% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -7.12% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.69% | +0.82% |
Volatility
FTIF vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is 4.25%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that FTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTIF | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.48% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 9.84% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.96% | 18.79% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 17.26% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 18.19% | +1.09% |