PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTI vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTI vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 61.48% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FTI has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 14.54%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 54.18% annualized return.


FTI

1D
1.87%
1M
1.77%
6M
43.71%
YTD
61.48%
1Y
102.31%
3Y*
59.43%
5Y*
53.37%
10Y*
14.54%

MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTI vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
61.48%54.90%44.78%66.07%105.91%-15.36%-55.23%12.09%-36.32%-11.44%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FTI and MU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001

0.31

The correlation between FTI and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTI:

$28.65B

MU:

$1.11T

EPS

FTI:

$2.59

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

FTI:

27.70

MU:

22.05

PEG Ratio

FTI:

0.03

MU:

0.08

PS Ratio

FTI:

2.94

MU:

12.33

PB Ratio

FTI:

8.76

MU:

11.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTI:

$10.19B

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTI:

$2.75B

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTI:

$1.13B

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTI vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTI
FTI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTI vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.69

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.36

23.23

-16.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.67

83.25

-65.58

FTI vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTI Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTI and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTI vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.74%

-98.25%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-30.28%

+13.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

-57.63%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.71%

-57.63%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.71%

-57.63%

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-19.29%

+12.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-58.07%

+24.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

8.43%

-2.52%

Volatility

FTI vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 10.95%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

33.63%

-22.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

62.19%

-39.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.85%

75.68%

-42.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.26%

54.75%

-12.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.66%

50.65%

-2.99%

Dividends

FTI vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
0.28%0.45%0.69%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.38%2.43%2.66%0.42%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FTI vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
2.49B
41.46B
(FTI) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTI vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TechnipFMC plc and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
59.7%
84.6%
Portfolio components
FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTI and MU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to FTI (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTI and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer