PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTI vs. AMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTI vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 46.47% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 50.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FTI has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 13.30%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.89% annualized return.


FTI

1D
-2.75%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
46.47%
6M
45.94%
1Y
86.16%
3Y*
65.31%
5Y*
50.06%
10Y*
13.30%

AMSC

1D
8.15%
1M
-16.28%
YTD
50.80%
6M
41.60%
1Y
42.76%
3Y*
86.23%
5Y*
24.53%
10Y*
17.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTI vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
46.47%54.90%44.78%66.07%105.91%-15.36%-55.23%12.09%-36.32%-11.44%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
50.80%16.85%121.10%202.72%-66.18%-53.54%198.34%-29.60%207.16%-50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTI and AMSC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001

0.28

The correlation between FTI and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTI:

$26.71B

AMSC:

$2.03B

EPS

FTI:

$2.59

AMSC:

$3.05

PE Ratio

FTI:

25.17

AMSC:

14.24

PEG Ratio

FTI:

0.03

AMSC:

0.03

PS Ratio

FTI:

2.67

AMSC:

6.37

PB Ratio

FTI:

7.94

AMSC:

3.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTI:

$10.19B

AMSC:

$299.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTI:

$2.75B

AMSC:

$91.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

FTI:

$1.13B

AMSC:

$19.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTI vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTI
FTI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTI vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIAMSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.17

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.60

0.67

+4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

1.11

+15.76

FTI vs. AMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the AMSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTI and AMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTI vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and AMSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIAMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.74%

-99.57%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-61.08%

+45.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

-63.86%

+34.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.32%

-82.94%

+41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.71%

-89.06%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-93.73%

+78.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-75.77%

+41.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

36.76%

-31.68%

Volatility

FTI vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 9.82%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIAMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

22.71%

-12.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.99%

55.16%

-33.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.91%

85.29%

-53.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.42%

87.45%

-45.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.72%

79.21%

-31.49%

Dividends

FTI vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison

FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
0.31%0.45%0.69%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.38%2.43%2.66%0.42%

Financials

FTI vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.49B
86.41M
(FTI) Total Revenue
(AMSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTI vs. AMSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TechnipFMC plc and American Superconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.7%
27.3%
Portfolio components
FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

AMSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

AMSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

AMSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTI and AMSC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to FTI (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs AMSC's -99.57%.

FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTI and AMSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer