FTEC vs. IAK
FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTEC returned 23.79%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for IAK. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
FTEC vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed IAK with an annualized return of 23.79%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.18% annualized return.
FTEC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.60%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.23M | $78.73M | $94.95M | |
| $15.27M | $20.59M | $12.29M |
FTEC vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 22.53% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and IAK is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.39 |
The correlation between FTEC and IAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTEC vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTEC
IAK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTEC
IAK
-
Communication Services
FTEC
IAK
-
Financial Services
FTEC
IAK
Industrials
FTEC
IAK
-
Energy
FTEC
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTEC
IAK
-
Basic Materials
FTEC
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
FTEC
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
FTEC
-
IAK
Real Estate
FTEC
-
IAK
-
Utilities
FTEC
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTEC vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
FTEC
IAK
FTEC vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTEC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.59 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 6.29 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -77.38% | +42.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -7.62% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -11.58% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -14.76% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | -44.95% | +10.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -3.20% | -5.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -16.01% | +10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 3.13% | +2.91% |
Volatility
FTEC vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 6.56%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTEC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 6.56% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.16% | 12.42% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 15.99% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 18.13% | +7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 20.92% | +4.07% |
FTEC vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTEC vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than IAK's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.42% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTEC and IAK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to IAK (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.79% vs 13.18% for IAK. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 13.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.38% for IAK.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTEC and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer