PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCS vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCS vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCS has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.


FTCS

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
10.24%

SCHX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.70%
YTD
11.20%
6M
10.96%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.19%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%13.05%26.71%-4.22%26.57%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.20%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and SCHX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FTCS and SCHX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTCS vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCS
SCHX

Financial Services

20.4%
9.9%

Industrials

19.6%
8.5%

Healthcare

19.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
4.5%

Technology

12.3%
37.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
10.3%

Energy

2.2%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

FTCS
20.4%
SCHX
9.9%

Industrials

FTCS
19.6%
SCHX
8.5%

Healthcare

FTCS
19.1%
SCHX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTCS
14.3%
SCHX
4.5%

Technology

FTCS
12.3%
SCHX
37.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCS
7.7%
SCHX
9.7%

Communication Services

FTCS
2.3%
SCHX
10.3%

Energy

FTCS
2.2%
SCHX
3.4%

Basic Materials

FTCS
2.1%
SCHX
1.8%

Real Estate

FTCS

-

SCHX
2.0%

Utilities

FTCS

-

SCHX
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCS vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCSSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.11

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

14.13

-12.90

FTCS vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCSSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

2.34

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.79

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCSSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-34.33%

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-9.02%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-19.04%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-25.41%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

-34.33%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-0.27%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-3.97%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

1.98%

+1.18%

Volatility

FTCS vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCSSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.86%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

9.03%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

11.98%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

17.12%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

18.14%

-2.60%

FTCS vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCS vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.11%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCS and SCHX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to FTCS (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.41% vs 10.24% for FTCS. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.41% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.

FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.03% for SCHX.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCS and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer