PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCS vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCS vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCS has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 10.37%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


FTCS

1D
0.34%
1M
2.84%
6M
2.28%
YTD
5.41%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
10.37%

ITOT

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.16%
6M
8.51%
YTD
10.96%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
5.41%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%13.05%26.71%-4.22%26.57%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
10.96%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and ITOT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2006

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FTCS and ITOT has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTCS vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCS
ITOT

Financial Services

20.0%
11.4%

Industrials

19.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

18.5%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
4.3%

Technology

13.6%
37.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.8%

Energy

2.1%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

FTCS
20.0%
ITOT
11.4%

Industrials

FTCS
19.6%
ITOT
9.1%

Healthcare

FTCS
18.5%
ITOT
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

FTCS
14.2%
ITOT
4.3%

Technology

FTCS
13.6%
ITOT
37.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCS
7.7%
ITOT
9.8%

Communication Services

FTCS
2.3%
ITOT
9.8%

Energy

FTCS
2.1%
ITOT
3.3%

Basic Materials

FTCS
2.1%
ITOT
2.0%

Real Estate

FTCS

-

ITOT
2.3%

Utilities

FTCS

-

ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCS vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCSITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.45

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

10.69

-8.41

FTCS vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCSITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-55.20%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-8.90%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-19.44%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-25.36%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

-35.00%

+3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.98%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-6.95%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.04%

+1.41%

Volatility

FTCS vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is 3.60%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that FTCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCSITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.05%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

10.15%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

12.87%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

17.47%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

18.25%

-2.73%

FTCS vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCS vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than ITOT's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.10%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCS and ITOT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FTCS (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.63% vs 10.37% for FTCS. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.

FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCS and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer