PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTC vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTC vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTC achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FTC has outperformed OUSA with an annualized return of 13.86%, while OUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.


FTC

1D
1.65%
1M
-2.62%
6M
9.62%
YTD
12.02%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
13.86%
ALL TIME*
10.41%

OUSA

1D
0.53%
1M
2.40%
6M
3.84%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
10.40%
ALL TIME*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.58M$2.78M$2.73M
$872.37K$1.31M$1.44M

FTC vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
12.02%15.89%26.60%20.72%-23.28%24.43%33.35%28.07%-6.03%25.32%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
7.09%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FTC and OUSA is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FTC and OUSA has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTC vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTC
OUSA

Technology

37.9%
23.7%

Industrials

27.4%
11.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
13.1%

Financial Services

6.0%
18.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.1%
10.3%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
7.4%

Energy

0.8%

-

Technology

FTC
37.9%
OUSA
23.7%

Industrials

FTC
27.4%
OUSA
11.9%

Healthcare

FTC
8.8%
OUSA
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTC
8.7%
OUSA
13.1%

Financial Services

FTC
6.0%
OUSA
18.6%

Basic Materials

FTC
2.7%
OUSA

-

Communication Services

FTC
2.1%
OUSA
10.3%

Real Estate

FTC
1.9%
OUSA

-

Utilities

FTC
1.8%
OUSA

-

Consumer Defensive

FTC
1.8%
OUSA
7.4%

Energy

FTC
0.8%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTC vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTC
FTC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTC Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTC vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.95

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

6.80

-2.13

FTC vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTC and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTC vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-33.12%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-8.36%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-13.14%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-19.54%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-33.12%

-1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-0.23%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-3.50%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.39%

+1.25%

Volatility

FTC vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that FTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

3.65%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.86%

8.12%

+9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.46%

10.25%

+11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

13.38%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

15.19%

+5.57%

FTC vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTC vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.15%0.20%0.32%0.65%0.90%0.00%0.40%0.64%0.35%0.40%0.86%0.52%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.35%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTC and OUSA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTC has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTC dropped -54.05% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 10-year performance, FTC leads with 13.86% vs 10.40% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTC has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FTC.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.15% for FTC.

FTC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. FTC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FTC and 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTC and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer