FTC vs. HLAL
FTC (First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FTC tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTC returned 13.05%/yr vs 15.73%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
FTC vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTC having a 17.28% return and HLAL slightly higher at 18.08%.
FTC
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 29.50%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- 42.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FTC vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 17.28% | 15.89% | 26.60% | 20.72% | -23.28% | 24.43% | 33.35% | 1.63% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.08% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTC and HLAL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FTC and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTC vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTC
HLAL
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
FTC
HLAL
Industrials
FTC
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
FTC
HLAL
Healthcare
FTC
HLAL
Financial Services
FTC
HLAL
Basic Materials
FTC
HLAL
Communication Services
FTC
HLAL
Utilities
FTC
HLAL
Real Estate
FTC
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
FTC
HLAL
Energy
FTC
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTC vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
FTC
HLAL
FTC vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTC | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.57 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 4.20 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 19.39 | -8.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTC | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 3.25 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.90 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.89 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
FTC vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTC | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.05% | -33.57% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -10.20% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -21.67% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.18% | -23.18% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -5.00% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.20% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FTC vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 3.59%. This indicates that FTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTC | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 3.59% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 9.97% | +4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 13.19% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 17.60% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 20.21% | +0.23% |
FTC vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTC vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than HLAL's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.65% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.86% | 0.52% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTC and HLAL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTC has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to HLAL (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTC dropped -54.05% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.73% vs 13.05% for FTC. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTC.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.18% for FTC.
FTC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTC and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTC and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer