FTBD vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTBD (Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTBD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTBD returned 5.08%/yr vs 30.60%/yr for FBCG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTBD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FTBD vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBD achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 15.59% return.

FTBD

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBD vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	0.99%	8.35%	1.77%	3.73%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	40.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBD and FBCG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2023	0.24

FTBD vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTBD	FBCG
Energy	100.0%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.3%
Financial Services	-	2.2%
Healthcare	-	6.7%
Industrials	-	5.7%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Technology	-	48.3%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

FTBD vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBD

FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 44
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBD vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTBD	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.14	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.84	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.61	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	10.14	-2.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTBD vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBD and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTBD	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.14	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.83	-0.08

Drawdowns

FTBD vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBD drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBD and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTBD	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-43.56%	+36.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-15.17%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.56%	-27.89%	+21.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-1.05%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-11.49%	+9.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	3.90%	-3.03%

Volatility

FTBD vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) is 1.47%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that FTBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTBD	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	4.79%	-3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	13.89%	-10.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32%	18.55%	-14.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.87%	25.79%	-19.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.87%	25.72%	-19.85%

FTBD vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTBD vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	5.03%	5.04%	4.76%	4.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTBD and FBCG in my portfolio?

FTBD and FBCG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTBD or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FTBD (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBD dropped -6.98% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, FTBD or FBCG?

On 3-year performance, FBCG leads with 30.60% vs 5.08% for FTBD. On fees, FTBD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FTBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTBD or FBCG?

Over the 3-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 30.60% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTBD or FBCG?

FTBD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTBD or FBCG?

FTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FTBD and FBCG?

FTBD is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FTBD and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.