FTBD vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTBD (Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTBD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTBD returned 5.20%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for PYLD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

FTBD vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTBD having a 1.43% return and PYLD slightly lower at 1.41%.

FTBD

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 5.72%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 6.83%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBD vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	1.43%	8.35%	1.77%	3.68%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.41%	9.57%	7.69%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBD and PYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.86

The correlation between FTBD and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTBD vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBD

FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 40
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 65
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBD vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTBD	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.23	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.26	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.11	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	9.56	-3.14

FTBD vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBD and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTBD vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBD drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBD and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTBD	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-4.52%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-3.25%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.56%	-4.52%	-2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-0.30%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-0.64%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.72%	+0.17%

Volatility

FTBD vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTBD	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	1.07%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.22%	2.62%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27%	3.08%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.84%	3.99%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.84%	3.99%	+1.85%

FTBD vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTBD and PYLD have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

FTBD vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

FTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than PYLD's 6.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	5.01%	5.04%	4.76%	4.69%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.27%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTBD and PYLD in my portfolio?

FTBD and PYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTBD or PYLD?

FTBD has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to PYLD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBD dropped -6.98% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which ETF is better, FTBD or PYLD?

On 3-year performance, PYLD leads with 8.06% vs 5.20% for FTBD. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTBD or PYLD?

Over the 3-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTBD or PYLD?

FTBD and PYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTBD or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 5.01% for FTBD.

What is the main difference between FTBD and PYLD?

FTBD is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PIMCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.