FTAG vs. QUAL
FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FTAG tracks the Indxx Global Agriculture Index while QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTAG returned 4.86%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for QUAL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTAG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUAL.
Performance
FTAG vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAG has underperformed QUAL with an annualized return of 4.86%, while QUAL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
FTAG
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
FTAG vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 8.59% | 14.82% | -6.72% | -7.28% | -4.52% | 17.31% | 13.88% | 9.05% | -19.46% | 24.88% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.65% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAG and QUAL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013 | 0.43 |
The correlation between FTAG and QUAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTAG vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTAG
QUAL
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
FTAG
QUAL
Industrials
FTAG
QUAL
Consumer Defensive
FTAG
QUAL
Healthcare
FTAG
QUAL
Consumer Cyclical
FTAG
QUAL
Communication Services
FTAG
-
QUAL
Energy
FTAG
-
QUAL
Financial Services
FTAG
-
QUAL
Real Estate
FTAG
-
QUAL
Technology
FTAG
-
QUAL
Utilities
FTAG
-
QUAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAG vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
FTAG
QUAL
FTAG vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAG | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.47 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 11.25 | -8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAG | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.88 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.70 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 0.80 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
FTAG vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than QUAL's maximum drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and QUAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAG | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.89% | -34.06% | -56.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -9.03% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -18.00% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.77% | -28.23% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.79% | -34.06% | -16.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.00% | 0.00% | -79.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.25% | -4.10% | -67.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.98% | +1.79% |
Volatility
FTAG vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 2.54%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAG | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 2.54% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 9.06% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 11.84% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.33% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.09% | +1.58% |
FTAG vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAG vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than QUAL's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.40% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAG and QUAL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTAG has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to QUAL (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs QUAL's -34.06%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.29% vs 4.86% for FTAG. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.
FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.15% for QUAL.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTAG and QUAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer