FTAG vs. ISCMF
FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTAG returned 4.49%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. FTAG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
FTAG
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 8.59% | 14.82% | -6.72% | -7.28% | -10.55% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAG and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAG vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
FTAG
ISCMF
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 2.53 | -1.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 6.69 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 15.54 | -12.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.05 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 0.45 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.89% | -25.42% | -65.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -5.69% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -7.62% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.00% | -5.26% | -73.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.25% | -13.42% | -57.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.44% | +1.33% |
Volatility
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) is 3.58%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that FTAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 7.14% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 15.90% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 18.53% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 14.37% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 14.37% | +5.30% |
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAG vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.40% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAG and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to FTAG (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 15.20% vs 4.49% for FTAG. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
FTAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTAG and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer