PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. FMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 5.39% return.


FTAG

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.16%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
5.24%

FMAY

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.63%
YTD
5.39%
6M
6.32%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAG vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
10.75%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%60.28%
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.39%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and FMAY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.51

The correlation between FTAG and FMAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTAG vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAG
FMAY

Basic Materials

55.5%
1.8%

Industrials

24.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
4.9%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
10.1%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

36.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Basic Materials

FTAG
55.5%
FMAY
1.8%

Industrials

FTAG
24.1%
FMAY
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

FTAG
8.4%
FMAY
4.9%

Healthcare

FTAG
7.8%
FMAY
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAG
4.2%
FMAY
10.1%

Communication Services

FTAG

-

FMAY
10.9%

Energy

FTAG

-

FMAY
3.5%

Financial Services

FTAG

-

FMAY
11.9%

Real Estate

FTAG

-

FMAY
1.9%

Technology

FTAG

-

FMAY
36.2%

Utilities

FTAG

-

FMAY
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAG vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAGFMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.66

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

21.48

-17.73

FTAG vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAGFMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.56

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.90

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

1.02

-1.35

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and FMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGFMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-13.60%

-77.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-4.22%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-13.12%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-13.60%

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.58%

-0.38%

-78.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-2.01%

-69.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

0.72%

+3.02%

Volatility

FTAG vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 1.02%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGFMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

1.02%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

4.59%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

6.04%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

10.59%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

10.15%

+9.51%

FTAG vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.37%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and FMAY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FMAY (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

On 5-year performance, FMAY leads with 9.48% vs 0.66% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.85% for FMAY.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and FMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer