FTAFX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTAFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FTAFX returned 3.89%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for LTSTX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTAFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M (FTAFX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAFX achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than LTSTX's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAFX has underperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 3.89%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.

FTAFX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.41%
• 6M: 4.66%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 3.89%

LTSTX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 8.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M	4.41%	9.66%	3.70%	7.58%	-11.88%	2.64%	8.20%	10.59%	-2.26%	6.90%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	5.20%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-6.41%	16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAFX and LTSTX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008	0.84

The correlation between FTAFX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTAFX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAFX

FTAFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FTAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FTAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FTAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FTAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FTAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 53
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M (FTAFX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTAFX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.11	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.05	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.41	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	2.67	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.11	12.06	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAFX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTAFX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.11	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.62	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.82	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.48	+0.27

Drawdowns

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAFX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAFX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTAFX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-48.17%	+28.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.76%	-5.24%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.02%	-8.12%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.30%	-21.01%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.30%	-23.33%	+7.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-6.16%	+3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.16%	-0.30%

Volatility

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M (FTAFX) is 1.81%, while Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that FTAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTAFX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.81%	2.02%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	5.39%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.55%	6.64%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.36%	9.18%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	9.83%	-5.18%

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTAFX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FTAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than LTSTX's 11.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class M	2.54%	2.73%	2.65%	2.42%	5.49%	4.88%	3.36%	3.28%	5.15%	2.91%	2.55%	2.62%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.59%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTAFX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

FTAFX and LTSTX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTAFX or LTSTX?

LTSTX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FTAFX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAFX dropped -19.56% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.