PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAAX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAAX achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAAX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.


FTAAX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.66%
YTD
5.61%
6M
6.25%
1Y
14.20%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
5.36%

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A
5.61%10.98%6.05%9.46%-12.55%5.69%10.84%13.05%-3.23%8.86%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.13%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAAX and QBDSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.52

The correlation between FTAAX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAAX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAAX
FTAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAAXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

0.56

+2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

0.83

+3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.10

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

0.65

+2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.28

1.83

+12.45

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAAX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAAXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.56

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.18

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.15

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.16

+0.55

Drawdowns

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAAX drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAAX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAAXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-18.38%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-3.09%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-3.76%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-7.40%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.76%

-18.38%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.94%

+7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-6.85%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.09%

-0.09%

Volatility

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that FTAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAAXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

0.67%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

2.39%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

3.60%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

4.32%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

5.26%

+0.90%

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAAX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

FTAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than QBDSX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A
2.48%2.55%2.79%2.49%4.58%1.56%1.96%2.96%3.51%2.55%1.34%3.24%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.47%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAAX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAAX has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to QBDSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAAX dropped -26.49% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

FTAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAAX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer