PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTA having a 15.56% return and RDVY slightly lower at 15.31%. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 11.26%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.


FTA

1D
0.75%
1M
1.78%
6M
12.39%
YTD
15.56%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
11.26%

RDVY

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.68%
6M
10.39%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
15.56%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
15.31%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and RDVY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between FTA and RDVY has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTA vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTA
RDVY

Financial Services

21.9%
33.5%

Utilities

10.8%
1.4%

Energy

9.8%
2.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.9%

Technology

8.8%
26.9%

Industrials

8.5%
13.6%

Real Estate

6.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
3.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
5.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Financial Services

FTA
21.9%
RDVY
33.5%

Utilities

FTA
10.8%
RDVY
1.4%

Energy

FTA
9.8%
RDVY
2.4%

Healthcare

FTA
9.7%
RDVY
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FTA
9.0%
RDVY
10.9%

Technology

FTA
8.8%
RDVY
26.9%

Industrials

FTA
8.5%
RDVY
13.6%

Real Estate

FTA
6.6%
RDVY

-

Consumer Defensive

FTA
6.4%
RDVY
3.4%

Communication Services

FTA
5.0%
RDVY
5.5%

Basic Materials

FTA
3.4%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTARDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

3.03

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.50

12.68

+2.82

FTA vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTA vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTARDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-40.60%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-9.04%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-19.11%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-25.32%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-40.60%

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.62%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-4.97%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.15%

-0.53%

Volatility

FTA vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 3.67%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTARDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.81%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

11.59%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

14.67%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

18.96%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

21.03%

-1.19%

FTA vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than RDVY's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.64%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.85%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and RDVY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to FTA (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.02% vs 11.26% for FTA. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.85% for RDVY.

FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.47% for RDVY.

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer