FTA vs. KWIN
FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FTA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
FTA vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.59% return.
FTA
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTA vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 15.56% | 5.47% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.59% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTA and KWIN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTA vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
FTA
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTA vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTA vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.45% | -1.50% | -60.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.44% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -0.25% | -8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility
FTA vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 4.16% | +7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 4.16% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 4.16% | +15.68% |
FTA vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTA vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTA and KWIN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for FTA and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer