PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSST vs. STPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSST vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSST

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STPZ

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.44%
YTD
1.49%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSST vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSST
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF
0.00%15.40%21.40%25.49%-18.30%12.52%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
1.49%6.40%4.30%4.28%-4.49%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FSST and STPZ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.12

The correlation between FSST and STPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSST vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSST vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSSTSTPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

FSST vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSST vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSTSTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

Volatility

FSST vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSTSTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.99%

FSST vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSST vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

FSST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSST
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF
0.10%0.19%2.01%0.68%1.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
4.76%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSST and STPZ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.

STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.10% for FSST.

FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.20% for STPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSST and STPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer