FSST vs. PCLN
FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and PCLN (Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF) are both Sustainable funds. FSST is passively managed, while PCLN is actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PCLN.
Performance
FSST vs. PCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLN
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- YTD
- 25.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSST vs. PCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 2.60% |
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 25.05% | -1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSST and PCLN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSST vs. PCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSST vs. PCLN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSST | PCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.94% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.70% | — |
Volatility
FSST vs. PCLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSST | PCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.39% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.39% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.39% | — |
FSST vs. PCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSST vs. PCLN - Dividend Comparison
FSST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% |
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSST and PCLN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSST is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSST is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PCLN.
FSST has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.06% for PCLN.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.70% for PCLN.
Find the right allocation for FSST and PCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer