FSST vs. FBTC
FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.
Performance
FSST vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- -21.11%
- YTD
- -31.72%
- 6M
- -31.53%
- 1Y
- -43.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSST vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.36% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -31.72% | -6.56% | 94.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSST and FBTC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSST vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
FSST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBTC
FSST vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSST | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSST vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSST | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -52.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -52.44% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.83% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.72% | — |
Volatility
FSST vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSST | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.35% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 50.11% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 50.11% | — |
FSST vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSST vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSST nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSST and FBTC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.
FSST has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.25% for FBTC.
Find the right allocation for FSST and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer