FSST vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
FSST and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSST is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
FSST vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSST vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.40% | 16.22% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSST vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSST vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
FSST
BDGS
FSST vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSST | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.51 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FSST and BDGS is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSST vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
FSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSST vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSST | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.15% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
FSST vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSST | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.70% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 8.35% | — |