PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRTX vs. FCSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSRTX having a 6.83% return and FCSRX slightly lower at 6.55%. Over the past 10 years, FSRTX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.


FSRTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
6M
3.20%
YTD
6.83%
1Y
12.84%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
5.18%
ALL TIME*
3.78%

FCSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
6M
2.98%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRTX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M
6.83%10.08%5.57%4.33%-3.58%15.50%3.49%10.24%-4.26%3.78%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
6.55%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRTX and FCSRX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005

0.98

The correlation between FSRTX and FCSRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRTX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRTX
FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRTXFCSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.36

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

10.54

+0.63

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRTX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRTX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRTX and FCSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRTXFCSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-33.91%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-3.50%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

-5.85%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.89%

-13.22%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.88%

-20.02%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-2.33%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-5.07%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.11%

0.00%

Volatility

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.62%. This indicates that FSRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRTXFCSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.62%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

3.78%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06%

4.88%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

6.90%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.74%

6.71%

+0.03%

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRTX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

FSRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than FCSRX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
2.54%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%
FSRTX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M
3.00%4.44%4.56%5.05%7.07%5.14%2.02%2.81%9.10%2.32%2.06%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FSRTX and FCSRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSRTX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to FCSRX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRTX dropped -33.57% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRTX and FCSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer