FSRNX vs. HLRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX).
FSRNX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index. It was launched on Aug 9, 2011. HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002.
Performance
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 0.93% | 3.03% | 4.99% | 11.93% | -26.14% | 40.66% | -11.31% | 23.78% | -4.91% | 3.15% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 3.75% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRNX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRNX has underperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 3.28%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.
FSRNX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 1.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -1.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRNX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRNX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRNX
HLRRX
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRNX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | -0.06 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 0.02 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.13 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | -0.34 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRNX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | -0.06 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.12 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.19 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRNX and HLRRX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
FSRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than HLRRX's 7.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.86% | 2.84% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 3.33% | 4.52% | 3.62% | 2.27% | 3.40% | 2.57% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.74% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Drawdowns
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRNX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, smaller than the maximum HLRRX drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRNX and HLRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRNX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.26% | -62.78% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -11.74% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.27% | -28.99% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.26% | -48.13% | +3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -12.54% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -8.52% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.33% | -1.12% |
Volatility
FSRNX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 3.62%. This indicates that FSRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRNX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.62% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 8.74% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 15.53% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 17.55% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 20.80% | +0.61% |