PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRIX vs. FGBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRIX achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly higher than FGBPX's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRIX has outperformed FGBPX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while FGBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.98% annualized return.


FSRIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.33%
YTD
3.36%
6M
3.76%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
4.46%

FGBPX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.50%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRIX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I
3.36%8.97%5.97%9.51%-11.91%3.50%7.50%11.01%-2.70%8.08%
FGBPX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I
0.18%7.16%0.89%6.08%-14.07%-1.15%9.99%9.63%-0.39%3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRIX and FGBPX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.49

Over the past year, FSRIX and FGBPX have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRIX vs. FGBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRIX
FSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FGBPX
FGBPX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FGBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRIXFGBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.18

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

1.39

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

3.86

+11.54

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the FGBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRIX and FGBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRIX drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, which is greater than FGBPX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRIX and FGBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRIXFGBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.98%

-18.75%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-3.03%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.00%

-6.09%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-18.75%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-18.75%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.45%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-4.79%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

1.09%

-0.47%

Volatility

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) at 1.20%. This indicates that FSRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRIXFGBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.20%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

2.99%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

4.08%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.00%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

5.01%

-0.54%

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FGBPX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRIX vs. FGBPX - Dividend Comparison

FSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FGBPX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGBPX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I
3.87%3.83%3.29%3.19%1.92%1.32%4.76%2.71%2.82%2.12%2.67%2.61%
FSRIX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I
4.24%4.29%4.11%4.28%2.91%4.18%4.53%4.30%3.74%4.17%3.75%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRIX and FGBPX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRIX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FGBPX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRIX dropped -22.98% vs FGBPX's -18.75%.

FSRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRIX and FGBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer