FGBPX vs. FCPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) and Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX).
FGBPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002. FCPIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997.
Performance
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBPX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I | -0.37% | 7.16% | 0.89% | 6.08% | -14.07% | -1.15% | 9.99% | 9.63% | -0.39% | 3.85% |
FCPIX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | -8.16% | 18.68% | 8.02% | 27.64% | -26.55% | 12.26% | 22.23% | 32.75% | -12.79% | 35.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGBPX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than FCPIX's -8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBPX has underperformed FCPIX with an annualized return of 2.15%, while FCPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.73% annualized return.
FGBPX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
FCPIX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -13.01%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGBPX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGBPX vs. FCPIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGBPX
FCPIX
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) and Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGBPX | FCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.29 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.54 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.29 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 1.15 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGBPX | FCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.29 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.24 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.36 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGBPX and FCPIX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Dividend Comparison
FGBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than FCPIX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBPX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I | 3.54% | 3.83% | 3.29% | 3.19% | 1.92% | 1.32% | 4.76% | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.12% | 2.67% | 2.61% |
FCPIX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | 5.92% | 5.44% | 0.70% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 3.79% | 0.11% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.21% | 0.37% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGBPX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum FCPIX drawdown of -67.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBPX and FCPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGBPX | FCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -67.79% | +49.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -14.45% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | -37.24% | +18.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.75% | -37.24% | +18.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -14.45% | +11.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -15.84% | +11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 3.60% | -2.60% |
Volatility
FGBPX vs. FCPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) is 1.60%, while Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that FGBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGBPX | FCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 7.72% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 12.32% | -9.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 19.46% | -14.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 18.45% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 17.81% | -12.83% |