FGBPX vs. NOCBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGBPX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I) and NOCBX (Northern Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FGBPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while NOCBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Northern Funds. Over the past 10 years, FGBPX returned 2.02%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for NOCBX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGBPX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for NOCBX.

Performance

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBPX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than NOCBX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBPX has outperformed NOCBX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while NOCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.18% annualized return.

FGBPX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: -0.07%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

NOCBX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 3.28%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGBPX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I	0.18%	7.16%	0.89%	6.08%	-14.07%	-1.15%	9.99%	9.63%	-0.39%	3.85%
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	-0.24%	6.17%	1.10%	5.07%	-14.51%	-1.62%	7.32%	9.76%	-1.03%	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBPX and NOCBX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2001	0.84

The correlation between FGBPX and NOCBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGBPX vs. NOCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBPX

FGBPX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FGBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FGBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FGBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FGBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FGBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

NOCBX

NOCBX Risk / Return Rank: 20
NOCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NOCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NOCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
NOCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGBPX	NOCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.23	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.93	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.54	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	4.60	+0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the NOCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBPX and NOCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGBPX	NOCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	1.23	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	-0.11	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.23	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.69	-0.18

Drawdowns

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBPX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum NOCBX drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBPX and NOCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBPX	NOCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.75%	-20.02%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.03%	-3.17%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.09%	-6.61%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	-19.95%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.75%	-20.02%	+1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-5.38%	+2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-2.92%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.05%	-0.02%

Volatility

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) is 1.31%, while Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that FGBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGBPX	NOCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	1.44%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	2.94%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	3.97%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.00%	6.12%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	5.07%	-0.07%

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBPX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NOCBX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBPX vs. NOCBX - Dividend Comparison

FGBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than NOCBX's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGBPX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I	3.87%	3.83%	3.29%	3.19%	1.92%	1.32%	4.76%	2.71%	2.82%	2.12%	2.67%	2.61%
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	4.05%	3.14%	3.82%	2.99%	1.66%	1.56%	3.58%	2.75%	3.16%	2.88%	2.05%	3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBPX and NOCBX in my portfolio?

FGBPX and NOCBX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGBPX or NOCBX?

NOCBX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to FGBPX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGBPX dropped -18.75% vs NOCBX's -20.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.