FSRIX vs. FIWGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSRIX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I) and FIWGX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FSRIX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FIWGX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSRIX returned 3.23%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FIWGX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSRIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FIWGX.

Performance

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRIX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than FIWGX's 0.17% return.

FSRIX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.93%
• 1Y: 9.58%
• 3Y*: 8.09%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: 4.40%

FIWGX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 4.32%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSRIX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I	3.44%	8.97%	5.97%	9.51%	-11.91%	3.50%	7.50%	11.01%	-1.06%
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	0.17%	6.90%	2.14%	6.51%	-13.71%	-0.37%	10.21%	9.39%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRIX and FIWGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.70

The correlation between FSRIX and FIWGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSRIX vs. FIWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRIX

FSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FIWGX

FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRIX	FIWGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	1.28	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	1.94	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.22	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	2.06	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.54	5.84	+9.71

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the FIWGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRIX and FIWGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRIX drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, which is greater than FIWGX's maximum drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRIX and FIWGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRIX	FIWGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.98%	-18.42%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-2.52%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.00%	-6.24%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.99%	-18.42%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.00%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-5.00%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	0.90%	-0.28%

Volatility

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) at 1.16%. This indicates that FSRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIWGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRIX	FIWGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.16%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.15%	2.78%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	4.04%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.54%	6.10%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.47%	5.50%	-1.03%

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWGX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRIX vs. FIWGX - Dividend Comparison

FSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FIWGX's 3.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	3.43%	3.68%	4.36%	3.79%	2.24%	1.77%	6.83%	4.30%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSRIX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I	4.24%	4.29%	4.11%	4.28%	2.91%	4.18%	4.53%	4.30%	3.74%	4.17%	3.75%	3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRIX and FIWGX in my portfolio?

FSRIX and FIWGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRIX or FIWGX?

FSRIX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to FIWGX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRIX dropped -22.98% vs FIWGX's -18.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.