PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRCX vs. FGBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRCX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than FGBPX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX has outperformed FGBPX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while FGBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.73% annualized return.


FSRCX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

FGBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.62%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.73%
ALL TIME*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
1.23%7.88%4.38%7.98%-12.53%2.56%6.41%9.95%-3.81%7.01%
FGBPX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I
-0.62%7.16%0.89%6.08%-14.07%-1.15%9.99%9.63%-0.39%3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRCX and FGBPX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.53

The correlation between FSRCX and FGBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRCX vs. FGBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRCX
FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FGBPX
FGBPX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FGBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRCXFGBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.91

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

2.24

+4.68

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the FGBPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRCX and FGBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRCX drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, roughly equal to the maximum FGBPX drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRCX and FGBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRCXFGBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-18.75%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.03%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-5.05%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-18.66%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

-18.75%

+2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-3.23%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-4.79%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

1.23%

-0.52%

Volatility

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) at 0.94%. This indicates that FSRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRCXFGBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.94%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

3.09%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

3.93%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

6.00%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.01%

-0.60%

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FGBPX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRCX vs. FGBPX - Dividend Comparison

FSRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than FGBPX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGBPX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I
3.58%3.83%3.29%3.19%1.92%1.32%4.76%2.71%2.82%2.12%2.67%2.61%
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
3.09%3.32%2.59%3.03%2.08%3.36%3.59%3.33%2.50%3.20%2.69%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRCX and FGBPX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRCX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to FGBPX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRCX dropped -18.16% vs FGBPX's -18.75%.

FSRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRCX and FGBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer