PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRBX vs. GAFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund Class AAA (GAFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than GAFSX's 6.77% return.


FSRBX

1D
1.35%
1M
6.37%
YTD
10.54%
6M
0.62%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
28.50%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
12.46%

GAFSX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.04%
YTD
6.77%
6M
5.82%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
28.99%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
10.54%11.11%30.13%8.48%-12.61%38.21%-11.73%35.60%-18.51%
GAFSX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund Class AAA
6.77%36.22%27.78%25.43%-11.28%28.74%-1.51%8.88%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and GAFSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.83

The correlation between FSRBX and GAFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. GAFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX
FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GAFSX
GAFSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GAFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GAFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund Class AAA (GAFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRBXGAFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.20

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

10.41

-5.96

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the GAFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and GAFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than GAFSX's maximum drawdown of -46.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and GAFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRBXGAFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.89%

-46.40%

-30.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-9.47%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-14.49%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.95%

-28.21%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-1.05%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-7.63%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

2.91%

+3.03%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund Class AAA (GAFSX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRBXGAFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.32%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

9.50%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

12.82%

+10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.79%

17.38%

+9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.52%

21.78%

+7.74%

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than GAFSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRBX vs. GAFSX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than GAFSX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
2.16%1.47%4.49%5.35%6.12%3.36%8.63%5.90%32.02%2.57%0.76%5.64%
GAFSX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund Class AAA
1.60%1.71%2.22%2.45%2.66%1.94%1.35%2.26%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRBX and GAFSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRBX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to GAFSX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs GAFSX's -46.40%.

GAFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRBX and GAFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer