FSRBX vs. FAFCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX).
FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986. FAFCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997.
Performance
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -2.09% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | -7.51% | 14.05% | 37.55% | 13.19% | -9.63% | 31.91% | -1.00% | 32.80% | -16.73% | 19.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than FAFCX's -7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has underperformed FAFCX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while FAFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.
FSRBX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
FAFCX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FAFCX's 1.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRBX vs. FAFCX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRBX
FAFCX
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRBX | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.28 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 1.46 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRBX | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.28 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.50 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.26 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRBX and FAFCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Dividend Comparison
FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FAFCX's 7.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.51% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | 7.21% | 6.67% | 9.04% | 1.58% | 5.50% | 3.78% | 1.85% | 0.45% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FAFCX drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and FAFCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRBX | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.89% | -76.00% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -14.43% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.95% | -25.75% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.23% | -46.01% | -5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.89% | -10.30% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -18.88% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.98% | 4.73% | +1.25% |
Volatility
FSRBX vs. FAFCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) at 5.12%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRBX | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 5.12% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 12.67% | +5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.58% | 21.23% | +6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 21.07% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.53% | 23.80% | +5.73% |