FSPGX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSPGX returned 15.46%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for FNCMX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSPGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 15.71% return.

FSPGX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 25.11%
• 5Y*: 15.46%
• 10Y*: —

FNCMX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 39.89%
• 3Y*: 27.54%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 19.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.39%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	15.71%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	27.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and FNCMX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.98

The correlation between FSPGX and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSPGX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.40	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.15	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.99	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	11.76	-6.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSPGX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.40	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.68	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.58	+0.31

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSPGX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-55.08%	+22.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-13.01%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-24.20%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	-35.64%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-0.95%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-7.86%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.81%	3.30%	+1.51%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) is 3.67%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that FSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSPGX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	4.23%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	12.13%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.44%	16.24%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.49%	22.45%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	22.04%	-0.49%

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSPGX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSPGX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FSPGX and FNCMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSPGX or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FSPGX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.