FSPGX vs. BSJS
FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) and BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both funds - FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Over the past 5 years, FSPGX returned 14.07%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for BSJS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSPGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJS.
Performance
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than BSJS's 1.84% return.
FSPGX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 2.98% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 11.34% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.84% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSPGX and BSJS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FSPGX and BSJS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSPGX vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank
FSPGX
BSJS
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSPGX | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.79 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 18.43 | -14.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and BSJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSPGX | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -17.73% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -1.64% | -14.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -4.44% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -17.73% | -14.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -0.07% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -3.97% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 0.34% | +4.53% |
Volatility
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.76%. This indicates that FSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSPGX | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 0.76% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 2.06% | +10.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 2.86% | +13.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 7.39% | +14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 7.13% | +14.43% |
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSPGX vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison
FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BSJS's 6.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.26% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSPGX and BSJS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to BSJS (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs BSJS's -17.73%.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSPGX and BSJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer